Quite right jdman.
Typical are the reviews of J&D albums on this site:
http://www.beachboys.com/jandean.htmlThe reviewer is genrally sympathetic - and he clearly has listened to the records. But his entire attitude is one of condescension. A few sample lines (Warning - stop reading here is easily annoyed!):
"J&D were never truly on a level with Brian Wilson's compositions. "
"Jan & Dean's first album, released on Dore in 1959, shows the sound of the duo firmly rooted in doo-wop and rock, with driving bass lines reminiscent of Mike Love's contributions to the Beach Boys" (!)
"Surf City - which was a song that Brian had given them out of friendship"
The review of Folk n Roll completely misses the point: the reviewer appreciates the humour on earlier albums, but really doesn't get it on "Hang on Sloopy", and generally seems to imply that you can't mix humour and Folk rock (which is more a statement about Folk Rock than about J&D, when you think about it!)
To be fair, he does acknowledge that the influence works both ways:
"the two groups decades-long friendship - a musical combination which benefitted both bands - from Brian Wilson, Jan & Dean got many of their most popular hits, while Brian adopted Jan & Dean's use of session players to augment the Beach Boys studio work, and also, to a degree, borrowed the duo's sound to build upon".
But all in all, the general tone is of an older brother: appreciative and patronising. The point is, there are relatively few websites which comprehensively review all the J&D albums, and so when one is written from such a perspective, it will further the myth that J&D were merely in the shadow of Brian Wilson.